VFX Artists React to the Moon Landing

Avaldati 1 apr 2021
Join OUR WEBSITE ► bit.ly/Crew_Membership
Consider Subscribing ► bit.ly/Subscribe_Corridor_Crew
Watch Season 5 From Beginning ► bit.ly/Crew_Season_5
THIS EPISODE ►
Niko, Wren, and Sam take a look some of the visual effects on display in the US Government's "Moon Landing" which supposedly took place in 1969.
FOLLOW ►
Instagram: bit.ly/_Corridor_Instagram
Sub-Reddit: bit.ly/_Corridor_Sub-Reddit
SUPPORT ►
Join Our Website: bit.ly/Crew_Membership
Buy Merch: bit.ly/Corridor_Store
OUR GEAR, SOFTWARE & PARTNERS ►
Puget Systems Computers: bit.ly/PC_Puget_Workstations
ActionVFX: bit.ly/TheBest_ActionVFX
Cinema4D: bit.ly/Try_Cinema4D
Motion Captured with Xsens Suit: bit.ly/Xsens_MoCap_Suit
Reallusion: corridor.video/Reallusion_3Dsoftware​
MUSIC ►
Epidemic: bit.ly/Corridor_Music click this link for a free month!

Kommentaarid

  • Can we see a foley artist reacts cause I would like know how certain sounds are made such as the last scenes of S2 E5 of The Boys. Plus I think it would be great if foley artist get some recognition.

  • What's the documentary that is referenced on this video?

  • You've really got to go back and do a VFX Artists React To your own project, Sync.

  • Can y'all do the JFK assassination?

  • Do a "VFX Artists React to Glitches in Reality"!!!

  • Where are the stars then Nico! Where are the stars

  • I wanna see you guys react to all the alien ufo videos now

  • Hey guys I suggest you react to K/DA Villain the animation is just crazy >

  • This was so good!

  • Maybe the cheapest way to fake the moon landing is to go to the moon.

  • I like how the comments are normal but the replies on them are just more “MoOn lAndINg fAkE” conspiracists.

  • Neil took the first mirror selfie in out of space

  • BREAKDOWN UFO FOOTAGE! ANYTHING TO DO WITH "LEAKED" GOVERNMENT STUFF LOL PLEASE

  • thank you for doing this

  • Corridor needs to react to the Jubilee video about the moon landing being fake and the earth being flat

  • Take down 9/11 footage to see if it could've been faked

  • And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. (Revelation 20:15) And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name. (Revelation14:9-11)

  • nah, conspiracy theorists would still believe the moon landing was fake because they lack the logic and critical thinking part of the brain

    • Or they just want attention

  • Breakdown how the Peterson Bigfoot footage. I'd like to see how Corridor would recreate that hoax. 😁

  • I knew it moonlanding is fake Earth is flat.

    • They literally said it in the video its impossible to fake. And earth is round, catch up to the 17th century

  • You can replicate parallel illumination to an extent, though it would be hard to do at this scale! But would be fun to see you try! eeclone.info/glo/mZbUeKSBg7CCy6w/video

  • I love that you are breaking down these footages from a film maker’s perspective.

  • I just want you to know that they would have to have our times of VFX, they did not so it was NOT faked. I'm very fun at party's.

  • Corridor needs to fake the moon landing

  • Your comments about technical things are lame, you never considered ~alien tech~

  • I thought this was going to be about For All Mankind :(

  • You guys sit here and debunk the "no moon landing" conspiracy, yet you have parroted the flat earth conspiracy which is far more dangerous and radicalizing

  • One of the main reasons people believe the moon landing is fake is because for no reason the Nasa wouldn't anyone have the original stream, they made every news outlet point their cameras to a wall where they proyect it the image. And also they lost the original tapes later, like dude, it's peak of human kind and you don't make backups of the video? You have to admit that's pretty weird

    • @Enzombie _First you say that they made backups and later you say that in that time they didn't have the modern mentality of making backups_ No, I meant to say that they didn't have the mentality of actually _recording_ important stuff for posterity. That backup was them going above what they usually did, _precisely_ because it was that important - but since the original transmission went through, and they didn't have any means of converting backups into a standard format with a better quality than they already had, they were deemed expendable. _and also, why did they to destroy the original tapes_ There was no "original tape". The transmission was supposed to be live, to be viewed _once._ Again, the backup was made in case there were problems with live transmission.

    • @Jan Strzelecki First you say that they made backups and later you say that in that time they didn't have the modern mentality of making backups, wich one is it? and also, why did they to destroy the original tapes and kept the backups wich where just a video proyected on a wall???? you can't tell me that isn't a little werid

    • _is because for no reason the Nasa wouldn't anyone have the original stream_ There was a perfectly good reason for that: at that time, there was no way for them to actually convert that stream other than filming it off the screen. Please realize that at the time there was no practical way of recording video streams longer than 30 seconds or so, so the "record the video off the screen/monitor on a film" method was actually widely used as a recording method. It was called Kinescope. You can look it up. _And also they lost the original tapes later_ No, they lost backups. Or, to be more precise, since backups were made just in case the live broadcast fails, and it didn't, they've decided to reuse them afterwards after running out of tapes. Because we still have the original recordings, the ones made off that wall. _like dude, it's peak of human kind and you don't make backups of the video?_ In the 60's, they actually _didn't._ They didn't have our modern mentality, the means to easily record video footage, or the means to easily convert the footage from one format to another.

  • Let's go! VFX artists react to big foot /loch Ness monster footage

  • Amy Shira Teitel, her EEclone channel "The Vintage Space" does an excellent explanation of how the Apollo Astronauts filmed and photographed on moon. "Why you don't see stars" eeclone.info/glo/lp_Wi4KfdbN_04I/video "Why the images look ghostly" eeclone.info/glo/1HiVpnWRk4eetJg/video "First step" eeclone.info/glo/sqzSiZ-Rio2m1mk/video

  • The moon landing was staged on the moon

  • Have you ever looked at the World Trade Center. That has to be one of the most damaging conspiracy theories out there. A thorough debunk how the buildings really collapsed because of the impact and the following firestorm must be addressed. Challenge.

  • I always chose to believe the moon landing was real, even if it wasn't, it was a great time. Inspired alot of people, automotive design, entertainment, books, sci fi, people's interest in space, etc. Was all based on the space race, and moon landing. I never understood why so many people were so against it and vigilant to debunk it. After Buzz punched a journalist in the face for calling him a liar and a thief, he became my favorite astronaut lol.

  • nasa hired the moon for moon landing.

  • I wanna see Bigfoot honestly

  • "No way...that's great. WE Landed on the MOON!"

  • Lol nice April fools joke this is hilarious

  • I would love to see more of these. Sad but true plane crashes look nothing like real like planes.

  • Vacuume in a room ? On in the space

  • Legend has it that Kubrick didnt like shooting on location at the moon so they flew to Mars instead and changed the Hue

  • Lucas Films........

  • The football field one. Couldn't it just be a rolling painted background? Kinda like when they simulated moving cars?

  • i want to see your opinion on the various ufo videos next!

  • you guys realize they had a mock up of the moon several stories tall in a sound stage, right? miniature don't exactly describe it except in relation to the moon.

    • _you guys realize they had a mock up of the moon several stories tall in a sound stage, right?_ Yes. It wouldn't be big enough to provide the level of fidelity visible in the _Apollo_ footage.

    • Any E V I D E N C Eof that claim? I couldn't give a singly flying fuck if you claim that's possible or it's "obvious". Any E V I D E N C E of that claim?

  • 5:33 My favorite fictional creature. Joe Biden.

  • can you guys make a short minimovie about giant insects?

  • Fun fact: There actually is some "atmosphere" on the moon. And about 20% of it is exhaust from Appolo missions engins. So, you can imagine how little atmosphere there is.

  • Please do Tremors and The Core for some ground/soil digging special effects. Thank you! cheers!

  • In all honesty, You guys are the Value Village of VFX.... the worlds still flat no matter what you think.

    • youre a fucking idiot

    • You're wrong. We know the Eath is round since Ancient fucking Greece. You're the kind of person that thinks you cracked the code. You haven'ty.

    • @jd0monty 3rd centuary bc

    • your just a disgrace to humanity I swear.

    • we've only been saying its round and proving it for the past 200 years. flat earth makes literally no logical sense in any way and i still cant comprehend why people like you think its flat.

  • Hot take: the "conspiracy" of the moon landings is the idea that it somehow mattered at all. People went to the moon. Found rocks. Moved on :/. Pretty cool I guess, and I enjoy Kerbal Space Program myself.

  • This made me believe in the moon landing more then any science documentary

  • 0:59

  • Moon + Ape = GME?

  • Maybe they faked the moon landing on the moon

  • The moon landing is real. If it wasn't, the Russians would've called them out.

  • there is no moon, there is the smoon.

  • That 'silly' shot at 2:55 was actually a near-death experience for that astronaut. His suit nearly ruptured when that happened

  • you should react to Gemini man

  • You should react to some kdramas. The stunts in Healer and The K2 are really great. Both are done by Ji Chang Wook. The Divine Fury is also really good! Its a korean movie with Park Seo Joon. The CGI and fight scenes in the 3 that I've listed are really good, at least in my opinion. Would be great to see some reaction videos to kdramas and kpop (Blackpink has some cool music videos). I know you reacted to parasite but it would be great if you react to some kdramas and kpop as well. Love the channel! Keep up the good work!

  • React to The Mask! And then... the son of the mask...

  • Have you guys reacted to Life of Pi? I was like 14-15 when that came out and remember hearing people talk about how groundbreaking the visual fx were. Would love to hear your opinion!

  • There is a radiation ring that would prevent them from actually landing to the moon, also there is a whole debunking video on Netflix, besides from sole fact that in 60's they didn't have technology to land on the moon. No stars, flag waving in the "wind" that doesn't exist in space obviously, no landing crater, everything looks so thin foil-y and crappy, that aircraft wouldn't fly them to another state let alone to the moon and back. I mean shit is fake as fuck but some people still believe they landed. It was just to win a cold war race. Come on guys. Look the documentary up on Netflix it's explained how they faked it. This is old news but I guess you guys haven't seen it and you think it's impossible to fake haha. Okay, well just watch the documentary you will get a kick out of it, they explain how they faked basically each shot. It's very cool how they did it.

    • @(S)-Riley Dunn thank you for schooling this fool

    • @(S)-Riley Dunn Nicely put

    • The van Allen radiation belts that you mention did not prevent the Apollo astronauts from reaching the Moon, because they consist of particle radiation, which can easily be blocked by metal shielding. Stop getting your information from movies on Netflix and face reality. The technology needed to land on the Moon existed. Name any piece of technology you think was needed and I can show you how it was developed. The technology for faking the Moon landing, however (in particular, the low gravity and vacuum) did not exist. Stars require a low exposure to be visible. The Moon is bright, so the exposure was high. Very simple. Why do you not understand that? Probably because you’ve watched too many Netflix movies and think everything should be like it looks in Hollywood. In space, light follows the laws of physics. The flag was not “waving,” it moved only when the astronauts touched it. As soon as they let go, it wobbles like a pendulum, showing that there was no air to dampen momentum. If you do the math, the pressure produced by the LM descent engine’s exhaust at touchdown was barely 1 PSI. That’s enough to lift up some dust, but not enough to make a crater. Again, Hollywood movies are not reality. Your inability to understand what the words “Mylar” and “passive thermal protection” and “pressure vessel” mean does not constitute a valid argument against the integrity of the CSM/LM spacecraft. The LM’s job was only to get two astronauts from lunar orbit, down to the surface of the Moon, and back up to lunar orbit again. That meant it didn’t need any aerodynamic shielding, and could be as flimsy as they needed. There was no “aircraft” on the Apollo spacecraft, I do not know why you mentioned one. It’s funny you mention the Cold War, because if the Soviet Union thought that the Apollo missions were faked, they would be the first to call out the US. But they didn’t, and actually admitted they were real. Stop getting your information from television, and do some real, factual, quantifiable research.

    • "No stars" I like this one as it shows the complete ignorance of photography of the conspiracy theorists. Have a go at some astrophotography some time instead of parroting this stupidity.

    • What "technology" do you need to land on the moon?

  • Did you know that there are no photos of Neil Armstrong on the Moon? His legs or back accidentally photobombed a number of shots, but there is not one photograph of him standing on the Moon, facing the camera. Watching the 16mm film footage from the later landings is also super cool!

    • That's not entirely correct. There are some photos of Armstrong on the Moon, facing camera, but unfortunately he's in the LM's shadow.

  • Are those hats available in the store?

  • I think I had a cool idea, you guys know the bad unreleased fantastic four movie from the 90s? Fix it, update Johnny’s effects, maybe make the thing look better, it’ll be hard, but we believe in you.

  • and than look at the image 5:11 . light from right, but in helmet reflexion the light make shadow as from back,even a bit to the left. moon landing is fake, and these guys to be fooled like this ... makes me wonder.. were they payed to be fools?

    • There’s no light from the right. Look at the ground. All the shadows are in front of the objects.

    • Nah, the shadow in the reflection shows the light to be from the front right exactly as expected. Is the curved reflective surface confusing you?

  • when you float (100kg) but the particles of moon land like sand on earth. rly? nice science

    • On Earth, sand reaches a terminal velocity and falls slower than most things. On the Moon, sand falls at the same rate as everything else, because there is no air resistance. Please do some research.

  • The tech to fake it didn’t exist in 1969

  • 4:49 You: pfffft Particles: zeeeewm

  • Their reactions are *_FAKE!!!_* *_WAKE UP, SHEEPLE! DO YOU'RE OWN RESEARCH FOR GOD'S SAKE THESE PEOPLE ARE THE GLOBALIST ILLUMINATI HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT AND LAUGHING AT YOU!!!_*

    • If anyone is a sheep it's you for believing such a stupid theory that has been proved to be wrong many times and by flat earthers.

  • A April Fools conclusion, get it?

  • Kubrick's best work 👌

  • React to Laser Cats!!!

  • I need Corridor Digital to see the masterpiece of melodysheep LIFE BEYOND II: The Museum of Alien Life

  • the virgin “moonlanding was faked” vs chad “the moonlanding was filmed on mars”

  • This is a really fun video idea

  • Do the patty video! Bigfoot for the win

  • Creating CGI in 60s, there is an idiots that this this is a CGI 🤣

  • Not gonna lie, I have herd more supporting evidence of the validity of the moon landing not be faked here than anywhere else lol

  • 1:55 Great observation Niko they actually did use a football field sized stage. Fun fact, the landing pad/platforms the rockets have to land on is also the size of a football field.

    • @Drafstman Roski 😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @Ryan Ware " how did they expect to land? " Lower gravitational pull and a properly calculated trajectory?

    • @Ryan Ware "The technology was the same we just advanced." So they had Wi Fi back then?

    • @Jack Whitlock how did they expect to land?

    • @Jack Whitlock Anything done today was done back then. The technology was the same we just advanced.

  • Moon landing deniers should watch this one.

  • no, armstrong WAS the first person on the moon. the camera shot you're looking at 5:25 was taken after the iconic moment. the iconic moment itself was recorded by a camera that was attached to the landing module itself and pointed to the ladder.

  • This episode was obviously fake and edited in such a way to try and convince humans on this flat earth that the moon landing was real as it was shot on location and edited by vfx artists in a bunker created by reptilians.

    • Tru

  • Even as a child I didn't understand why people were debating whether this is real or not. There where 6 moon landings, why tf do people think the first was fake?

    • You say our, but I don't know which country you are from hahaha

    • It's becasue our public education sector is literally one of the worst in the world so we get people that have almost no critical thinking skills, or basic scientific knowledge.

  • Would it be fucked up if I asked yal to react to the 9/11 footage

    • Probably

  • Sasquatch sighting video!

  • Please react to Sol Levante, it’s on Netflix. It’s an absolute masterpiece, and it’s only a couple minutes long.

  • How about some good ghost and shadow people videos, like on Nukes top 5 or El Franco Andres?

  • OmG hOW MuCh dId NaSA paY uUuU?!!11!!

  • This is definitely the most creative April Fool’s video I’ve seen. Also the most entertaining and informative as I didn’t leave it thinking it was a waste of time.

  • That dust comment is enough reason to understand that these shot are made in the moon, period. Actually this is the first time I hear someone calling that out, not even the experts mention that, so good point.

  • I'd like to see them debunking lots of UFO footage.

  • As Neil Degrasse Tyson said, "It is much more expensive to fake the moon landing than going to the actual moon"

  • So in 1960's they had cgi technology like wtf are people seriously brain ded , only few years passed since 1945 WW2 not even proper color TV was adapted world wide and people saying ohhh it's fake , it's fake bcuz the flag is flying or wtfever dude.

  • Loved this!! More of these type videos!

  • When Astronauts reviewed these guys visual effects they all agreed that they were fake

  • Now will you guys react to The launch scene from _Apollo 13_ ? The VFX supervisor, Rob Legato, discussed that scene in his TED talk.

  • Since you mentioned it, will you really react to the Patterson Bigfoot video? I'd love to see that.

  • I don't believe that the moon landing was fake but there is a way that make light look like it's further away using a fresnel lens

  • They are bullshiting, the government paid them to say all this .

    • Please tell me you're joking